To say, "you are what you love" (see James K.A. Smith) is not actually all that far from saying "you are what you do"--which is the hegemonic claim of a capitalistic anthropological imaginary. The two claims both emanate from some autonomous interior self, outward--perhaps from an ego or super ego. The two claims were, after all, side by side in Freud's mind. When he was asked, "what must a 'normal' person be able to do well?" Freud answered, "lieben und arbeiten
" ("to love and to work," see Erik Erikson, Identity Youth and Crisis
, 136). The really dramatic shift, therefore, would not be for us to move from "you are what you do" to "you are what you love," but instead to insist, "you are a child of God" and to answer Freud's question by saying, "a person must BE loved."
"A person's humanity is defined and maintained by God's gracious movement towards them in love." -John Swinton (From Bedlam to Shalom, p. 31).
Post a Comment